Type | Episode |
---|---|
Date | 1989-05-22 |
Tags | questionable morality, cloning |
Star Trek: The Next Generation 2x18
The Enterprise must aid two colonies struggling for survival, each with its own peculiarities. One colony was made up of people returning to a simpler way of living (as they say), and the other included scientists who ended up cloning themselves after an accident killed most of the colonists (there are only five of them).
The episode wasn't great, but the most startling thing is the way the crew of the Enterprise feel about clones. Granger, the leader of the Mariposa colony, requests some genetic material from the Enterprise, so that his colony won't die out:
Picard: How can we help you?
Granger: We need an infusion of fresh DNA. I was hoping that you would be willing to share some tissue samples.
Riker: You want to clone us?
G: Yes.
R: No way, not me.
G: How can you possibly be harmed?
R: It's not a question of harm. One William Riker is unique, perhaps even special. But a hundred of him, a thousand of him diminishes me in ways I can't even imagine.
G: You would be preserving yourself.
R: Human beings have other ways of doing that. We have children.
P: I think you will find that attitude prevalent among all the Enterprise people.
Since the Enterprise won't help them, the Mariposans steal some genetic material instead. Riker's reaction to this... I said startling, above, but shocking or appalling might be more appropriate.
Granger: Stop!
G: Murderers!
Riker: Like hell! You're a damn thief!
Pulaski: Gentlemen, please.
G: What else could we do? We asked for your help and you refused us. We're desperate. Desperate!
R: And that gave you the right to assault us, to rob us.
G: We have the right to survive!
Perhaps this shouldn't be so surprising, given Picard's treatment of his future duplicate in Time Squared, but it's still disturbing. And Riker scarcely defends himself. To the charge of murder he replies not 'this was not murder' but 'you are a thief'. Whether Granger was a 'thief' or not, the clone was certainly innocent, and Riker is still a murderer. And how must Granger have felt about this? He, too, is a clone: will Riker murder him for some little provocation?
Moreover, this isn't the treatment given to Riker's transporter-malfunction-created clone, nor do I recall any other clones getting this treatment during Trek. Just for this one episode, murder is fine as long as it's consanguineous.
Melinda M. Snodgrass, the episode's writer, commented on the issue:
"It is ironic, because I got enormous flack from the right to life coalition because they destroyed the clones," elaborates Snodgrass. "They thought I was condoning abortion. In fact, I did put a line in Riker's mouth that was very pro-choice and the right to life coalition went crazy. He says I told you that you can't clone me and you did it against my will, and I have the right to have control over my own body. That's my feeling and it was my soapbox, and it was one I got to get on. I was supported by Maurice all the way."
Maybe the pro-life side had a problem with the pro-choice message, but I think this misses the point, a bit. No one on the pro-choice side thinks that a person should be able to sneak into a hospital and kill a baby in an incubator. No one but Riker, anyway.
Character | Type | Name |
---|---|---|
Danilo Odell | None | Barrie Ingham |
William T. Riker | Main | Jonathan Frakes |
Wilson Granger | Main | Jon De Vries |
Brenna Odell | Sub | Rosalyn Landor |
Katherine Pulaski | Sub | Diana Muldaur |
Miles O'Brien | Appearance | Colm Meaney |
Name | Role | Character |
---|---|---|
Barrie Ingham | Actor | |
Colm Meaney | Actor | |
Diana Muldaur | Actor | |
Jon De Vries | Actor | |
Jonathan Frakes | Actor | |
Melinda M. Snodgrass | Author |
|
Rosalyn Landor | Actor | |
Winrich Kolbe | Director |
|